America should adopt a tax system based on net worth for the following reasons.
- A tax on net worth has the largest tax base. The net worth of this country is larger than the income system, about $9 trillion, and the consumption system, less than the gross domestic product, (GDP) about $14 trillion. The individual assets of $55 trillion and business assets of about $60 trillion is over 8 times larger than the consumption system.
- Income is not a measure of being rich, net worth is. George Will has said that the wealthiest 1-percent of households have more assets than the lowest 90%, $16 trillion. Since the total individual assets are $55 trillion. The wealthiest 10% own about 73% of the net worth in the USA. The biggest 1-percent of corporations own 80 % of the business net worth.
- Taxes should be based on ones ability to pay. A tax on net worth is the fairest tax to all. Net Worth is the measure of ones ability to pay.
- Taxes on net worth have the lowest percentage. America’s budget is about $3 trillion. A consumption system requires a sales tax of over 21%. A net worth tax would be less than 3%.
- A tax on net worth is the most versatile. Besides a flat tax of 3% for individuals and businesses, there are other possibilities. Some people say we have double taxation. We could tax only people at 6% or only businesses at 6%. Since businesses can’t vote and they pass there cost on to their customers, that is the best way to go. Next is the progressive path. The first $1 million could be tax-free and increase by 0.1 % for each $1 million up to 5% after $50 million.
- A tax on net worth is the simplest to file. Take what you own minus what you owe. Our present tax system is 63,000 pages of loopholes. Example: a person leases a car. The lessee does not own the car, so no tax. The leasing company owns the $25,000 car, but has a $10,000 loan. The company is taxed on $15,000. ($25,000 minus $10,000) The loan entity has $10,000 of assets so it pays tax on $10,000.
- A tax on net worth is the easiest to enforce. Since this is a property rights country, all assets are traceable. Taxing only the most prosperous 10 % of businesses and people is the most efficient tax system.
- Like the consumption tax, all of our present taxes could be replaced, Individual income tax, corporation income tax, employment taxes, gift tax, and estate tax. Plus the excise tax.
- Guarantees funding for all budget items like social security and Medicare by eliminating use taxes. User fees or tolls are another way for the wealthy and businesses to avoid paying taxes. Budget items come out of general funds.
- A tax on net worth promotes transparency. When a company shows an annual report with a book value of $1 billion and only $10 million in taxes, they aren’t paying their full taxes.
A tax on net worth promotes free trade. Money, inventory, buildings, etc. are all assets so everyone can move assets around for the best effect. - Eliminate inflation. Dr. Milton Friedman said to end inflation, stop printing money. By increasing the tax rate 1%, the national debt of $9 trillion could be paid off in 10 years.
- We start collecting 100 percent of our earnings in every paycheck. We all get virtual raises, since payroll taxes are no longer siphoned from our checks.
- Reducing taxes on the poorest 90% will raise revenue. When people have more money to spend, they buy more goods, which means more profit for businesses and the wealthiest 10%. Money flows up, water trickles down.
- A tax on net worth promotes jobs. Employees cost companies less since the employment taxes are repealed and therefore employees become more competitive in the global market.
- A progressive tax on net worth levels the playing field. Small companies that create the most jobs become more competitive with large companies.
- A tax on net worth removes some incentive to move plants overseas. Taxes are based on assets no matter where they are located. What you own minus what you owe.
No comments:
Post a Comment